International Law Enforcement Academies (ILEA) Criminal Law Practice Exam

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

1 / 400

In the case of Jordan being questioned as a juvenile, should the detectives have read him Miranda?

No, he was not in custody

Yes, he was interrogated in a secure area

The correct response indicates that Miranda rights should indeed be read to a juvenile like Jordan when he is being interrogated in a secure area. The requirement for reading Miranda rights applies when a person is both in custody and being subject to interrogation. In this scenario, being in a secure area typically implies a degree of coercive authority inherent in the situation, suggesting that the individual does not feel free to leave. This condition necessitates that the rights be read, as it protects the individual's constitutional rights against self-incrimination.

In the context of the other options, even though custody is a critical factor, simply asserting a lack of custody does not account for the specifics of the interrogation setting or the nature of the questioning. Informality alone does not negate the need to read Miranda rights. Therefore, it’s essential to consider that once authorities have a juvenile in a secure area, the legal precedent necessitates the reading of these rights to ensure the juvenile's understanding and protection during questioning.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Yes, juveniles automatically require it

No, the questioning was informal

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy